In the rapid development of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology, public chains and alliance chains are driving innovation and application in the industry in different ways respectively. In this paper, we will compare these two chain structures in detail, analyze their respective advantages and challenges, and explore which approach has greater development potential in the future. Through in-depth analysis, we can gain a clearer understanding of the differences between public chains and coalition chains, as well as their applicability in different scenarios, helping investors and developers make more informed decisions.
What are public and alliance chains?
Before delving into the prospects of both, it's important to first understand their basic concepts.
Public Chain: Decentralization and Openness
Public Blockchain (PBC) is a fully decentralized form of blockchain where anyone can participate in the maintenance and operation of the network. Public Blockchain ensures transparency, security and censorship resistance through decentralization, and it is not dependent on any single institution or organization. Bitcoin and Ether are the most famous representatives of public chains.
Features of public chains include:
- Fully decentralized: all participants can join or leave the network equally.
- Openness: Anyone can view, validate and submit transactions, ensuring open and transparent data.
- High security: Due to decentralization, it is very difficult for attackers to tamper with the data on the chain.
The drawbacks of public chains, on the other hand, are relatively slow transaction confirmation and higher transaction fees, as consensus and validation by multiple nodes is required.
Alliance Chains: Centralized Trust and Efficiency
A Consortium Blockchain, on the other hand, is a blockchain network maintained by a number of pre-selected participants, who are usually well-known companies or organizations in the industry. Instead of being completely open like a public chain, a consortium chain has certain thresholds and permissions management.
The characteristics of a federation chain include:
- Partially decentralized: only designated members can participate in the maintenance and operation of the node.
- EFFICIENCY: Transactions are processed quickly and at low cost due to the limited number of participants.
- Trust mechanisms: There is a high level of trust in data transmission and processing as the participants are trusted entities in the industry.
The disadvantages of federated chains are lower transparency and weaker resistance to censorship because of the limited number of participants and their more centralized governance mechanisms.
Comparison of Application Scenarios of Public Chain and Alliance Chain
Different application scenarios have different needs for public chains and alliance chains, which is where their respective advantages lie.
Advantageous Application Scenarios of Public Chain
Public chains are best suited for application scenarios that require decentralization, openness and transparency. Example:
- Financial Transactions and Payments: Public chains such as Bitcoin and Ether provide decentralized monetary systems that allow for payments and transactions on a global scale.
- Smart Contracts and DApps: Public chain platforms such as Ethernet support the development of smart contracts and decentralized applications (DApps), providing developers with more room for innovation.
- Digital Assets & NFTs: Public Chain is well suited for issuing and managing digital assets such as tokens, NFTs, etc. as it is highly transparent and censorship resistant.
Advantageous Application Scenarios of Coalition Chain
Coalition chains are more suitable for industry applications that require certain trust mechanisms and higher efficiency, especially in the business sector. Typical applications include:
- Supply Chain Management: Multiple companies or organizations can share data through an alliance chain to increase transparency and optimize logistics management.
- Financial cooperation: Cross-border payments, clearing and settlement between banks and financial institutions can be realized through the chain of alliances for a more efficient flow of funds.
- Healthcare: Sharing of medical information and management of patient data can be done through federation chains to safeguard privacy while improving data processing efficiency.
Technology Comparison between Public Chain and Alliance Chain
There are many differences in the technical implementations of public and alliance chains, and these differences can directly affect their performance and scalability.
1. Consensus mechanisms
Public chains usually use mechanisms such as Proof of Work (PoW) or Proof of Stake (PoS) to ensure the security and decentralization of the network. Proof of Work (PoW), such as the Bitcoin network, can maintain the security of the network through a large amount of arithmetic power, but its energy consumption is high. Proof of Stake (PoS), on the other hand, participates in the network consensus through coin holdings and is more energy efficient than PoW.
Coalition chains, on the other hand, typically use more lightweight consensus mechanisms, such as the Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT) algorithm or the Raft protocol, which are better suited for efficient transaction processing and network environments with a small number of participants.
2. Extensibility
Public chains have some scalability challenges. As the number of participants and transactions increases, the performance of public chains tends to be limited, especially in terms of transaction processing speed and network latency.
Coalition chains, on the other hand, perform better in terms of scalability as it has a relatively small number of nodes and the participants are pre-selected and the network is relatively more efficient and capable of processing.
Which chain is more promising?
The future of public chains
Public chains have a promising future in cryptocurrency and blockchain applications. With the rapid development of emerging fields such as decentralized finance (DeFi), NFT, and smart contracts, public chains are becoming the cornerstone to support these innovative applications. Especially in the field of global payment and value transfer, the decentralized nature of public chain will greatly reduce the cost of the traditional financial system and improve financial inclusion.
Challenges for public chains remain. How to increase transaction speeds and reduce costs, and how to achieve better scalability and user experience globally are still issues that need to be addressed.
The Future of Alliance Chain
The prospect of alliance chain, on the other hand, is mainly reflected in enterprise applications, especially in industries that need to process and share data efficiently. With the acceleration of digital transformation, alliance chain has important application potential in supply chain, finance, healthcare and other fields. As it is more suitable for solving data sharing and trust issues among enterprises, the development space of alliance chain in enterprise-level applications is still very broad.
However, a limiting factor of the federation chain is that it is relatively weakly decentralized, and some users may have concerns about its transparency and resistance to censorship.
summarize
Public chains and alliance chains each have their advantages and limitations. The decentralization, openness and transparency of public chain make it a strong prospect in the fields of finance, digital assets and smart contracts, while the coalition chain has a more practical application value in the fields of inter-enterprise cooperation and supply chain management due to its efficient, private and controllable features. In the future, with the development of technology and changes in industry needs, public chains and coalition chains may complement each other and coexist in different fields, promoting the comprehensive application of blockchain technology.
Chinese 
English